In 2004 nearly all blooming plants produced abundant ripe fruits, providing a solid database for all aspects of maturation phenology. 2005, by contrast, was marked by extremely few fruits. A high percentage of plants having bloomed produced no ripe fruits; and of those that did produce fruit, most had only a few berries that fully matured. Unlike 2004, there was no basis for plotting periods of peak infructescence in 2005. In 2005 the paucity of fruit seemed to result from fungal infestation and an abundance of insect damage, especially from larvae of unknown origin, during the bloom cycle. In 2006, the winter—spring drought severely impacted the development of fruit for B. trifoliolata, and only two plants, adjacent to springs, had more than just a few fruits. [The 2006 survey is still ongoing.]
| n for Bloom Survey | Plants with Green Fruit on April 30 | Percent | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BETR | 30 | 17 | 57% |
| BESxT | 13 | 6 | 46% |
| BESW | 20 | 13 | 65% |
Chart 1 shows the percentages of plants of each set that had at least one ripe fruit at the given date in 2004 & 2005. The results for the two years are essentially the same — considering the lack of fruits in 2005, with the hybrids intermediate, as with the bloom times.
Chart 2 shows periods of peak fructescence in 2004 - the point at which a bush was judged to be uniformly covered with red (ripe) fruits or, in the case of a few plants with relatively few fruits, the point at which the number of ripe fruits began to decline. For some bushes the peak stage extended over several dates.